Further reading
Since the mid 90s, Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) has been at the center of medical education and practice.
In the ND program, we use the term Evidence Informed Practice, (EIP) as this language better reflects the focus of the ND approach.
So, what is - and isn't - EBM/EIP? The oft-cited work by David Sacket describes what the EBM approach is, and acknowledges the limitations. It's a short article and a good one to know as it set the foundation for medical education.
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 312(7023), 71–72. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.716
And what has developed in EBM since 1996? If you're interested in how the field has developed in the last 20 years, this review brings you quickly up to speed on the criticisms/responses, and development of the EBM approach. It also teases what is still to come in the next 25 years - read on to see the state of the field as you embark on your education, and what the field may develop into through the course of your careers:
Djulbegovic, B., & Guyatt, G. H. (2017). Progress in evidence-based medicine: A quarter century on. The Lancet, 390(10092), 415-423. doi:http://dx.doi.org.buproxy.bastyr.edu:2048/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31592-